Alexandria Expungement Lawyers
Handling routine and litigated expungements in Northern Virginia
We have successfully expunged numerous cases, including the expungement of felony offenses amended to misdemeanors.
The existence of a criminal charge, even if dismissed, can potentially impair employment or leasing opportunities, cause harm to reputation, and have other collateral consequences.
In this regard, our lawyers can advise on whether a particular criminal charge is eligible for expungement, which can sometimes be complicated.
In general, for a Virginia charge to be qualified for expungement, the accused must have been found not guilty or the charge must have been dismissed via accord & satisfaction, nolle prosequi, or otherwise dismissed.
See Virginia Code 19.2-392.2. If the accused was found guilty of the offense or a court found that there were facts sufficient to find the defendant guilty, generally, the charge cannot be expunged.[1]
What is considered “otherwise dismissed” per Virginia’s expungement statute can sometimes be complicated.
For instance, if a charge has been amended to a different offense, the original charge may be considered “otherwise dismissed” and eligible for expungement provided it is not a lesser-included offense of the original offense.[2]
As an example, if a felony assault & battery on a police officer charge was amended to disorderly conduct, the felony assault charge is otherwise dismissed and is eligible for expungement because disorderly conduct is not a lesser-included offense of assault on a police officer.
If a charge is eligible for expungement, the person petitioning for expungement still must meet the statutory standard to demonstrate entitlement to the expungement.
In general, for a felony offense or for a person with a prior criminal record, the petitioner must show the existence of the record to be expunged to be a manifest injustice to the petitioner.
If the matter sought to be expunged is a dismissed misdemeanor and the petitioner has no prior criminal record, the burden would be on the Commonwealth to demonstrate good cause as to why the matter should not be expunged. See Va. Code 19.2-392.2(F).
Regarding the effect of an expungement, the Virginia Supreme Court stated that “[t]he expungement statute applies to innocent persons, not to those who are guilty.” Gregg v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 504, 507 (Va., 1984). That is, a circuit court, upon signing an order expunging the police and court records related to a criminal matter necessarily finds that the petitioner is an innocent person within the meaning of Gregg. This comports with the policy of the Virginia General Assembly in passing the expungement statutes:
The General Assembly finds that arrest records can be a hindrance to an innocent citizen’s ability to obtain employment, an education and to obtain credit.
It further finds that the police and court records of those of its citizens who have been absolutely pardoned for crimes for which they have been unjustly convicted can also be a hindrance.
This chapter is intended to protect such persons from the unwarranted damage which may occur as a result of being arrested and convicted.
Virginia law prohibits disclosure of expunged records
Virginia Code § 19.2-392.4
However, there may be an occasion where someone will be asked to disclose on a federal employment application whether the person has ever been arrested or charge, even if the charge has been expunged.
In such a situation, this is not governed by Virginia Code § 19.2-392.4 (B), which applies only to state and local governments in Virginia, and disclosure may be required.
If an employer or entity outside of Virginia requested disclosure of a Virginia expunged record, the firm would need to review the law of the particular state to determine whether it would be appropriate to report the arrest.
[1] It is possible, however, to expunge a misdemeanor offense, even after a finding of guilt, that was reopened and dismissed in a general district court or appealed and dismissed by a circuit court. A case appealed to the appellate courts and subsequently overturned and dismissed could also be eligible for expungement.
[2] The Virginia Supreme Court ruled that a petitioner is entitled to expunge a charge that has been amended to another offense if the elements of the new offense are not “subsumed” within the original charge and do not form the sole basis for the conviction on the new offense.
Virginia Code §19.2-392.1
Virginia law also prohibits disclosure of expunged records by a court or police and makes it a crime to do so, subject to very narrow circumstances. Virginia Code §19.2-392.3 below:
- It shall be unlawful for any person having or acquiring access to an expunged court or police record to open or review it or to disclose to another person any information from it without an order from the court which ordered the record expunged.
- Upon a verified petition filed by the attorney for the Commonwealth alleging that the record is needed by a law-enforcement agency for purposes of employment application as an employee of a law-enforcement agency or for a pending criminal investigation and that the investigation will be jeopardized or that life or property will be endangered without immediate access to the record, the court may enter an ex parte order, without notice to the person, permitting such access. An ex parte order may permit a review of the record, but may not permit a copy to be made of it.
- Any person who willfully violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Virginia Code §19.2-392.3
Employers operating in Virginia, Virginia educational institutions, and Virginia state and local government entities are prohibited from inquiring about expunged records. Virginia Code § 19.2-392.4 states:
- An employer or educational institution shall not, in any application, interview, or otherwise, require an applicant for employment or admission to disclose information concerning any arrest or criminal charge against him that has been expunged. An applicant need not, in answer to any question concerning any arrest or criminal charge that has not resulted in a conviction, include a reference to or information concerning arrests or charges that have been expunged.
- Agencies, officials, and employees of the state and local governments shall not, in any application, interview, or otherwise, require an applicant for a license, permit, registration, or governmental service to disclose information concerning any arrest or criminal charge against him that has been expunged. An applicant need not, in answer to any question concerning any arrest or criminal charge that has not resulted in a conviction, include a reference to or information concerning charges that have been expunged. Such an application may not be denied solely because of the applicant’s refusal to disclose information concerning any arrest or criminal charge against him that has been expunged.
- A person who willfully violates this section is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor for each violation.
Virginia Code § 19.2-392.4
However, there may be an occasion where someone will be asked to disclose on a federal employment application whether the person has ever been arrested or charge, even if the charge has been expunged.
In such a situation, this is not governed by Virginia Code § 19.2-392.4 (B), which applies only to state and local governments in Virginia, and disclosure may be required.
If an employer or entity outside of Virginia requested disclosure of a Virginia expunged record, the firm would need to review the law of the particular state to determine whether it would be appropriate to report the arrest.
[1] It is possible, however, to expunge a misdemeanor offense, even after a finding of guilt, that was reopened and dismissed in a general district court or appealed and dismissed by a circuit court. A case appealed to the appellate courts and subsequently overturned and dismissed could also be eligible for expungement.
[2] The Virginia Supreme Court ruled that a petitioner is entitled to expunge a charge that has been amended to another offense if the elements of the new offense are not “subsumed” within the original charge and do not form the sole basis for the conviction on the new offense.
AWARDS & ASSOCIATIONS
WHAT PEOPLE SAY
At King, Campbell, Poretz, and Mitchell, your satisfaction is our priority! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.
-
Mr. Ryan Campbell is The Great Lawyer! Very knowledgeable about the law and had my case dismissed!
- Eduardo O. -
Right from the start, I felt like I was in good hands. I could tell Joe King really cared about my situation and believed me.
- Mark T. -
Mr. King has the ability to really and truly listen, and then starts to strategize from a point of understanding.
- Meti L. -
From our initial meeting and throughout the process I had a 100% confidence I had made the right choice. Joe was easy to communicate with, very professional.
- J.G. -
Mr. Campbell went above and beyond to defend me and I am great-full to have representing me.
- Habte Z. -
My case became so complex and Evelyn managed to be one step ahead each time. She kept me updated at every step.
- Rinku S. -
Mr. Sherlock is definitely for the people he represents.
- Evin R. -
I highly recommend Evelyn Mitchell, if your marriage must be dissolved she is a lawyer you can trust to watch for your best interests and bring you to a good conclusion.
- Ross B.